Last week, the Ohio Supreme Court issued an opinion in In re Application of Griffin denying an applicant’s admission to the bar on the sole basis that he did not have a plan to pay back $170,000 in student loans. The Court’s opinion–delivered “per curium” because no justice signed his or her name to this shameful opinion–is manifestly unjust, unfair, and out of touch. The Ohio Supreme Court should overturn this embarrassing ruling immediately.
In a lengthy seven-part article, the New York Times asks, “Is Law School a Losing Game?” Answer: yes. Why is it a losing game? Student loans, of course. Lots of them.
This article comes as no surprise to law students and recent graduates. Law schools publish deceptive employment statistics, and prospective students, in reliance on those numbers, take out hundreds of thousands of dollars in student loans to attend. Many law students who graduate with a six-figure debt burden are subsequently unable to find high paying jobs (or even moderately paying jobs) sufficient to justify their debts. This happens year in and year out.
- Pwn (v.) Slang term derived from the verb own, as meaning to appropriate or to conquer to gain ownership. The term implies domination or humiliation of a rival.
Like StudentPwns on Facebook
Follow @StudentPwns on Twitter
TagsAmerican Bar Association bankruptcy bi-modal salary distribution carpentry CBS Corinthian Dean John Y. Gotanda default discharge for-profit colleges for-profit schools fraud GradPLUS graduate students higher education bubble IBR income-based repayment interest interest rates law school lawsuit Masters in Business Administration MBA mission statement New York Times Ohio outstanding student loans Pell grants PLUS President Obama private student loans Robert Applebaum Sallie Mae scam SOTU Stafford loans state of the union student debt student loan bubble student loan interest student loans Undercover Boss undue hardship Villanova Law Washington Post